Is HBK the only wrestler who don't need title reigns to staple his spot as one of the greatest? - how to spot bike goggles from steeming up
which has almost as many as Taker HHH Flair Queen, etc., but it is still considered one of if not the greatest of all time.Why it?
4 comments:
Because it is HBK. He did not need answers, and follow know.
Bruno Sammartino, Pedro Morales and Bob Backlund is the title of queen of the fighters you mentioned, but stayed in the WWWF Heavyweight Championship reign longer than those with 4 or more Championship.
This is true even if there is their fair share of the title.
I want to tell others who do not need a queen RVD are, he never had much of the world title reign, there is probably the biggest names in ECW, and had only a few short tracks in the world of the WWE is still very popular and talked, and There are many fans who want and expect the return of RVD. The other star I can think about is Y2J did not wear the title as many times as Flair and HHH, and not really the World Cup title, in fact, might need a world champion in a week and then lose to an IC champ, does not reduce its credibility of the entire cycle because their parties are always great, no matter who is in the ring with him.
I do not know will not believe how many fans really RVD and Y2J on the same level as HBK & Y2J RVD, but both are considered large in its own right, and many fans will be labeled as two of the largest.
I would say since HBK is so much effort into their gameis a big part of the body and soul to put on a great game, basically, do not go to a place and a half @ ss, it is considered one of the greats of all time.
For there is no better than The Undertaker.
Post a Comment