What do you think is the best quality HD camera of these 3 options: Sony HDR-SR11, Sony HDR-SR12 or JVC gz-hd6? - 3ccd low light
What do you think is the best camera, the quality of these 3 options: Sony HDR-SR11, Sony DCR-SR12 or JVC GZ-HD6. Please do not believe the price, hard disk capacity, or the simple conversion of images using the software. I ask for your opinion on what device you think, which produce crisp, clear, (as the material for distribution even under less than optimal), such as low light. I also read that 3CCD is usually better than CMOS. Accept yourself and what is the significance of this factor. The JVC GZ-HD6 is equipped with 3 CCDs, but with 2 CMOS camera from Sony. Finally, I read that the JVC GZ-HD3 JVC Everio GZ-HD7 and both had had bad image stabilizers, but JVC argues that the corrected versions of HD5 and HD6. Do you know if it really improves the image stabilizer?
Friday, January 29, 2010
3ccd Low Light What Do You Think Is The Best Quality HD Camera Of These 3 Options: Sony HDR-SR11, Sony HDR-SR12 Or JVC Gz-hd6?
2 comments:
The records of the results of Sony HDR-SR12 is the best option, they are all well and hope that you expect from them, but Sony is definitely the best home mark, trade and broadcast standard. better optics and a system
Find all the CMOS cameras, 3CCD has nothing to do with the CMOS, a CMOS sensor, a system for integrating 3CCD color 3CCD is a positive aspect of the camera, but the technology Sony has greatly reduced the need for this, as the systems and technology in the Sony camera, in particular the control of computer graphics and color aspects of the much larger than the camera from JVC
What I have is the JVC GZ-HD6 and were very satisfied. I was in the TV industry for 29 years, I have a good picture when I see it.
JVC is no imitator when it comes to video. They invented VHS. JVC, Sony and Panasonic cameras and tape recorders to produce the specifications for television. JVC invented the technology and production of integrated circuits by Sony, may have a large number of individual pixels CCD sensor is used to reduce the video resolution, including the aspect ratio conversion. Quite a feat considering that the whole process needs to be done in 1 / shall be at 30 seconds or less.
After both single chip and multi-chip professional camera systems, 3-chip gains used. A single-chip has a resolution, but suffers from discoloration is anything but perfect lighting conditions. In Missouri, gray sky as a natural, but here are a deep blue in Wyoming. It's just not worth it to be constantly adding filters, please fill out the lights and other things that only one shot a 3-CCD camera could get get naturally.
I remember the first video camera lens stabilizes Schwemer TV technology. JVC uses the same method, but unlike Schwemer, which was only 6x and before the lens is, the joint venture version of the entire zoom range on the left. It works best in television, where the secondary hand with a video camera is not usually possible. In the vast majority offer no significant improvement, but should not necessary. I have not bought, remain a Palm device on a tripod stand. The Sony OIS works the same way.
What separates the two houses be like, except for HD cameras is the quality of the lens is the number of pixels on the CCD is not as important as the solution to the solution of the lens. Sony uses Carl Zeiss and JVC used Fujinon, both are first class.
The Sony camera is a bit more expensive, but more functions of the joint venture did not look like this.
1. S-video (JVC AV)
2. Since the JVC is not the convention, which can only record at 1080x1920. Sony can genea higher pixel images.
3. Sony offers an optional video mode 3:4 If you do not want in HD.
4. Sony has a traditional viewfinder, in addition to the LCD.
Both devices are good and have groups of very similar properties. You will not be a bad choice anyway.
Post a Comment